« Opposing virtual influencers and “real” influencers is wrong: Why Lil Miquela and Shudu are here to stay » – Luxury Daily

« Opposing virtual influencers and “real” influencers is wrong: Why Lil Miquela and Shudu are here to stay » – Luxury Daily

Topic: The rise of CGI influencers and what it means for brands

Op-Ed

Media: Luxury Daily

« Everybody talks about “influence”. But no one truly knows its borders. Close friends are supposed to be more influential; but when it comes to solving a technical issue with your computer, don’t you ask Google? Niche influencers are supposed to be tremendously more powerful than influential blockbusters like Rihanna, but when it comes to experimenting with a new Fenty product, don’t you want it? Influence is a mess; and that’s why it’s so great to work on, for, with, against it: it can’t be automatized; its routes require strange chemistry. It can’t be totally earned nor marketed. The only thing we know is that a digital influencer is a person, a thing, who/which can generate change among one or more people. CGI do, not by stealing “real human beings” influence, but by providing another scheme. « 

Comments (0)
Join the discussion
Read them all
 

Comment

Hide Comments
Back

This is a unique website which will require a more modern browser to work!

Please upgrade today!

Share